Changes to the Master's ProgramSeptember 2009
|
| We have also changed how the judging is conducted on each entry into the Master's Program. Originally, three judges would judge each entry individually, resulting in three score sheets with various scores and comments. The average of these scores would determine the final outcome of the entry. Often times the comments and scores created confusion for the entrant. To resolve these concerns, we will continue using three judges for each entrant, however, the judges will work together and determine the points to be awarded for each standard. The scores will be placed on one sheet and a total provided that will determine whether the entrant passes or fails. The form will now be a standard size sheet of paper. One copy will be made for the file and the original will be returned with the egg entry to the entrant. The score sheet also has criteria that can be checked for common errors. There is also a comment section for the judges to provide suggestions. An example of the new score sheet is at the right. |
|
| We did a trial judging in Ohio utilizing the new procedures for scoring. The judges believed this process was in the best interest of the judges and the entrants. The judges reviewed and discussed each standard and all were in agreement with the outcome of the scores. If at any time the three judges cannot come to an agreement on the total the steward will make the final determination. |
|
|